While I’m not big on outlines, when I’m writing I find it’s good to know what my ending is. Gives me a goal to shoot for. This goes both for each individual novel, and the series as a whole.

I was thinking about this early this morning, as I mentally ran through the final dialogue to my back-burnered TV series. I’ve read that John Wells knew early on how he was going to end THE WEST WING. (Frankly, I think he got it wrong. When asked what he was thinking about as they flew away from Washington, President Bartlett’s closing line should have been, "What’s next." I thought that "Tomorrow" was a little uncharacteristic.) I’ve also read that Amy Sherman-Paladino knew the exact four words that were to end GILMORE GIRLS – but then she left the show in its final year after a contract dispute with WB, so we’ll never know what those words were going to be.

I have to admit, there’s a part of me that rebels at the notion of a fixed end-point. Having experienced the awe that comes from letting a story flow where it wants to, there’s something too constraining in the idea. But I can’t deny that it’s helped me. Knowing how each novel in the Mercutio series ends (at least through book five) does two things. It gives me a definite goal, and it allows me to lay the groundwork not just for each novel, but several novels to come.

I’m just thinking aloud here, but since I’m often asked these kinds of questions, I thought I’d try to put down some more concrete thoughts. I guess I’m saying it good to know where you’re heading, as long as the journey has the freedom to detour now and again.